<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Ok To Not Believe In Global Warming?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.misanthropytoday.com/is-it-ok-to-not-believe-in-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.misanthropytoday.com/is-it-ok-to-not-believe-in-global-warming/</link>
	<description>Because If You Don't Hate Others Nobody Else Will</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eyedunno</title>
		<link>http://www.misanthropytoday.com/is-it-ok-to-not-believe-in-global-warming/#comment-5472</link>
		<dc:creator>Eyedunno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.104.43.74/~misafox6/?p=59#comment-5472</guid>
		<description>&quot;The problem with science is not really what it can explain, but rather what it can’t explain.&quot;

Science is a method, not a set of facts.  As such, &quot;what we can&#039;t explain&quot; is the most fertile ground for science!

&quot;It starts from a faulty premise which is, all things are how they should be now.&quot;

Science doesn&#039;t start from any such premise.  Pundits and policymakers might (see Al Gore), but that&#039;s not science.

Furthermore, there is no debate among climatologists over whether global warming is happening. There is some debate over to what degree it is caused by humans, but that&#039;s about it.

On to the comments:
&quot;I agree wasting energy is stupid, but for moment imagine how much human energy is being wasted on global warming, which is at best a theory.&quot;

Actually, it&#039;s not a theory, it&#039;s an observation.  A theory in science is an explanatory framework, so &quot;global warming is influenced profoundly by human activity&quot; could be a theory, but &quot;global warming is occurring&quot; would not be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The problem with science is not really what it can explain, but rather what it can’t explain.&#8221;</p>
<p>Science is a method, not a set of facts.  As such, &#8220;what we can&#8217;t explain&#8221; is the most fertile ground for science!</p>
<p>&#8220;It starts from a faulty premise which is, all things are how they should be now.&#8221;</p>
<p>Science doesn&#8217;t start from any such premise.  Pundits and policymakers might (see Al Gore), but that&#8217;s not science.</p>
<p>Furthermore, there is no debate among climatologists over whether global warming is happening. There is some debate over to what degree it is caused by humans, but that&#8217;s about it.</p>
<p>On to the comments:<br />
&#8220;I agree wasting energy is stupid, but for moment imagine how much human energy is being wasted on global warming, which is at best a theory.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, it&#8217;s not a theory, it&#8217;s an observation.  A theory in science is an explanatory framework, so &#8220;global warming is influenced profoundly by human activity&#8221; could be a theory, but &#8220;global warming is occurring&#8221; would not be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed hardy tanks</title>
		<link>http://www.misanthropytoday.com/is-it-ok-to-not-believe-in-global-warming/#comment-5444</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed hardy tanks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.104.43.74/~misafox6/?p=59#comment-5444</guid>
		<description>I think we have to take action now because the global is more and more watrmer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we have to take action now because the global is more and more watrmer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.misanthropytoday.com/is-it-ok-to-not-believe-in-global-warming/#comment-5412</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 07:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.104.43.74/~misafox6/?p=59#comment-5412</guid>
		<description>The global warming is true,but I am not sure everyone can do something for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The global warming is true,but I am not sure everyone can do something for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flynvfae</title>
		<link>http://www.misanthropytoday.com/is-it-ok-to-not-believe-in-global-warming/#comment-5372</link>
		<dc:creator>flynvfae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 02:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.104.43.74/~misafox6/?p=59#comment-5372</guid>
		<description>pretty sure the planet goes through cycles of change in temperature all the time... look it up liberals...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty sure the planet goes through cycles of change in temperature all the time&#8230; look it up liberals&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Climategate &#124; Misanthropy Today</title>
		<link>http://www.misanthropytoday.com/is-it-ok-to-not-believe-in-global-warming/#comment-5335</link>
		<dc:creator>On Climategate &#124; Misanthropy Today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://216.104.43.74/~misafox6/?p=59#comment-5335</guid>
		<description>[...] written about thinking global warming is bullshit  there and here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written about thinking global warming is bullshit  there and here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
